Find Your Career

Featured Jobs

Local Business

Coyote Logistics

UPS to buy Coyote for $1.8 billion to ease peak cargo crunch

ATLANTA — United Parcel Service Inc. will buy Coyote Logistics in a $1.8 billion bid to jump into the freight brokerage business and improve holiday-season shipping performance. The deal could help generate additional revenue and savings of as much as $150 million, UPS said Friday, as the company expands into the business of linking customers with thousands of haulers able to do the work. UPS could also tap into Coyote’s network of 35,000 trucking companies for extra help during its crucial November-December peak season. Acquiring a freight broker that doesn’t have its own vehicles is a departure for Atlanta-based UPS. The world’s largest package-delivery company operates a fleet of 100,000 vehicles spanning trucks to motorcycles. Coyote had $2.1 billion in revenue last year, and while UPS doesn’t break out its full- truckload brokerage revenues, a spokesman, Steve Gaut, said the acquisition would accelerate those sales. “The brokered full-truckload freight segment is a high growth market and we expect it will continue to outpace other transportation segments,” UPS Chief Executive Officer David Abney said in a statement. The deal combines UPS and its 100,000 ubiquitous brown package vans and other vehicles with Coyote’s experience linking customers to a chain of 35,000 trucking companies. The partnership will help reduce the number of trips UPS drivers make without generating a return, according to Gaut. After a delivery, UPS drivers often have to go back to their starting point, sometimes without much cargo to haul. UPS makes about 7 million of these so-called empty leg trips every year. Coyote, whose clients range from food and drink companies to retailers and paper and industrial firms, should be able to help fill some of those empty trailers with customers’ goods in the future, Gaut said. While trucking companies aren’t typically seen as hip, Chicago-based Coyote has a young workforce and a fast, trading- floor feel, as employees match shippers with haulers, Gaut said. Founded in 1907, UPS is acquiring a 9-year-old company most recently owned by private-equity firm Warburg Pincus. While Robert W. Baird & Co. analyst Ben Hartford speculated in a July 23 note that Coyote’s “youthful, ‘Millennial’ culture” could be a challenge for UPS to absorb, Gaut played down such concerns. “We’re going to operate this business as a subsidiary of UPS so they will keep their brand, their facilities, their secret sauce,” he said. William Blair & Co. analyst Nate Brochmann said the purchase would give UPS a foothold in an area it’s been lacking, and follows a pattern of transportation companies offering many types of services. “With better technology and visibility into supply chains today, there are now more opportunities for transportation providers to be one-stop shops,” Brochmann wrote in a July 23 note after news of a potential deal broke. The transaction would be the third-largest logistics deal this year as the industry consolidates amid rising consumer demand. In April, FedEx Corp. agreed to buy Dutch delivery company TNT Express NV for $4.8 billion. Days later, XPO Logistics Inc. agreed to acquire France’s Norbert Dentressangle SA in a deal valued at $3.53 billion including debt. UPS has focused on smaller purchases since European regulators thwarted its attempt to purchase TNT for about $6.9 billion in 2012. That same year it purchased a Belgian company, Kiala, that set up a system where customers could have packages delivered to a nearby store, instead of their homes. UPS has expanded this service under its Access Point brand, announcing earlier this week it will offer it in 100 additional U.S. cities. In June, a UPS subsidiary bought a small logistics firm serving the jewelry business called Parcel Pro. Terms weren’t disclosed.

Harmons Wangsgards File Art 02-1

Harmons, Ridley's keeping quiet on grocery store change

OGDEN — When Harmons grocery announced in mid-July that it will be leaving Ogden to be replaced by Ridley’s Family Market, the community reacted with an immediate and apprehensive uproar. Shoppers at the Harmons Five Points store wanted to know why their beloved grocer was skipping town and what they could expect from the new kid. When the Standard-Examiner first reported the upcoming change, which is set to take place in mid-September, social media chatter and speculation went wild. The original story on the change has generated nearly 2,500 shares on various social media platforms and online commenters lit up both the Standard’s website and Facebook page. Stories immediately following the initial report generated similar interest.  But while the public seems to be dying for details, the owners of the two businesses are keeping their heads down, not willing to say much about the shake-up. The Standard-Examiner requested interviews with both Bob Harmon, vice president for customers at Harmons, and Mark Ridley, director of operations for Ridley’s. The paper first contacted the pair in mid-July, but after multiple attempts, was ultimately unable to get answers from either party about the transaction and future expectations for both stores.  Initially, both entities asked that interviews be conducted via email, but Harmons officials decided not to participate after reading the questions that were submitted. Ridley’s did not respond to two different email inquiries. “We were under the impression that this was going to be a profile story on the Harmon family,” said an email from Mary Rice, a public and media relations manager working with Harmons. “This seems to have taken a different turn from the original profile piece that was discussed and agreed to. We have no additional information to add, as nothing has changed since the news was announced. For specific questions regarding the future of the Ogden location, please contact Mark Ridley.” Ridley was contacted by phone and email, but did not respond to questions about the new store in Ogden. The Idaho-based grocer took control of the Wangsgards Market & Bakery, 120 N. Washington Blvd., Ogden, in April. That store is across the street from the Harmons store space it will be taking over. In an April 27 story, Ridley told the Standard-Examiner little would change at Wangsgards, an assurance that included keeping the grocery store’s longtime name and the 90-some people it employed. Harmons and Ridley’s, in their July 16 announcement, said Ridley’s will try to do the same with Harmons employees. “It is the goal of both Harmons and Ridley’s to offer positions to current employees,” the release said. “Many Harmons associates will be given the opportunity to transfer to another Harmons location, while others will be offered new positions at Ridley’s.” The press release did not provide information about wages for employees who would be absorbed by Ridley’s, nor did it offer specifics on which stores retained employees could be transferred to. Harmons stores in green, Ridley’s in blue. Rice did say Harmons has no plans to close its Roy location, 5370 S. 1900 West, or its Station Park store, 200 Station Parkway in Farmington. California-based LBG Real Estate Companies LLC purchased The Family Center at Ogden Five Points, where Harmons is located, for an undisclosed sum in late 2013. Soon after the purchase, the company completed a $2 million renovation project on the entire 161,795-square-foot shopping center, including major renovations at Harmons.  Attempts to reach LBG were unsuccessful. Contact reporter Mitch Shaw at 801-625-4233 or Follow him on Twitter at @mitchshaw23.  

Windows 10

Here's how to prepare for Windows 10

The big day for Microsoft's release of the Windows 10 operating system is upon us. With some hefty new features, including a new browser that replaces Internet Explorer, it may be tempting to upgrade. And that's exactly what Microsoft wants you to do, but there are good reasons to wait. If you are a Windows 7 or 8 user, you may have noticed a Windows flag in the lower righthand corner of your screen — that's the installation mechanism to upgrade. (If you use one of those operating systems and you do not see the flag, it means you have system updates available, which should be installed whether or not you plan to upgrade.) In an upgrade this big, there are bound to be bugs. To be sure, Microsoft will address them quickly and release updates, but the process will go much smoother if you wait a few months. The free upgrade is available for a full year, so relax and prepare yourself and your computer for the change. There are several things you need to know before you install Windows 10. First, is the new system compatible with your computer? You can check with Microsoft's tool. Go ahead and click the little flag to launch the Microsoft 10 upgrade tool — don't worry, you can stop before any changes are made to your system. Once the Get Windows 10 window opens, look for the three bar icon in the upper left corner and click on it. Under "Getting the upgrade," select "Check your PC. Microsoft will run a diagnostic tool to determine if your computer has enough memory, sufficient processing power and that your data and files are ready. If you'd prefer to check for yourself, here are the requirements: ● Your computer must be running the latest version of Windows 7 SP1 or Windows 8.1 Update ● 1 gigahertz or faster processor ● 1 gigabyte of RAM for 32-bit operating system or 2 GB for 64-bit OS ● 16 GB available on your hard disk for 32-bit OS; 20 GB for 64-bit OS ● DirectX9 or later graphics card with WDDM 1.0 driver ● Display resolution of 800 x 600 To find the matching specs on your computer, 8.1 users may start by typing "PC info" into the search bar found on the start screen. Windows 7 users should navigate to the Control Panel, select "System" to see the same information. You'll have to dig deeper to find available hard disk space and your graphics card. Frankly, I'd opt for the tool. If your computer does not meet the requirements, you can forget about this for now. When it comes time to buy a new computer, you should not have to worry about getting one with the current OS. In fact, beginning with Windows 10, Microsoft will update it regularly and automatically, eliminating the problem of out-of-date versions in the market like we saw with 8 and 8.1. Which version of Microsoft 10 is right for you? Microsoft 10 comes in seven versions, but unless you're a large business owner, an educational institution, using it on a mobile device or building a robot, you need only be concerned about Windows 10 Home and Windows 10 Pro. These are designed for the home and small business user. Both come with the new features we've been hearing about like the revamped Start Menu, Edge browser and voice assistant Cortana. Pro adds data encryption tools and remote desktop support, along with several other business-oriented features. You’ll be upgraded to a version of Windows that's equivalent to the one you’re already running. So if you have a copy of Windows 7 Starter, Home Basic or Home Premium, or are running Windows 8.1, you will receive Windows 10 Home. Windows 10 Pro replaces Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 8.1 Pro, and Windows 8.1 Pro for Students. If you are eligible for the Home upgrade, but want to upgrade to Pro, it will cost $99. For those who decide to go ahead and upgrade to Windows 10, allow several hours for the process. Start a time when you won't be needing to use your computer, say at the end of the day. The installer is about 3GB and download time will depend on the speed of your Internet connection. Installation should take around an hour, but will depend on your hardware. Once the upgrade starts, you'll see a progress window showing a percentage as it climbs toward completion. Leslie Meredith has been writing about and reviewing personal technology for the past six years. She has designed and manages several international websites. As a mom of four, value, usefulness and online safety take priority. Have a question? Email Leslie at

Oils Big Slump

Extended slump in oil taking toll on industry, economy

NEW YORK — As drivers, shippers and airlines continue to enjoy lower fuel prices, the oil industry is responding to much lower profits with sharp cuts in spending and employment that are hurting economic growth. Low oil and gas prices are good for the overall economy because they reduce costs for consumers and business. U.S. economic growth was higher in the second quarter, and economists say that was partly fueled by consumers spending some of their savings on gasoline at stores and restaurants. But with oil prices down around 50 percent from last year, major oil companies are cutting back, offsetting some of this good news. For instance, Exxon Mobil said Friday it cut spending by $1.54 billion in the second quarter, while Chevron announced it is laying off 1,500 workers. Until about six months ago, booming U.S. oil and gas production was helping the country’s economy grow during a time of economic sluggishness. David Kelly, chief global strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, said this week that a $29 billion decline in oil exploration and mining activity in the U.S. cut economic growth by 0.7 percent in the second quarter, a sizable chunk for an economy that grew 2.3 percent. Investors also feel the pain. Lower oil profits have an outsized effect on stock markets because the companies are so enormous. Analysts at RBC Capital Markets wrote that when oil prices drop by 10 percent, earnings for the overall S&P 500 fall by 1 percent. Industry layoffs seem to be accelerating. Royal Dutch Shell, while announcing Thursday that profits fell 25 percent in the second quarter, said it would cut its global workforce by 6,500. Chevron’s quarterly profit fell 90 percent and CEO John Watson said the company is reducing its workforce “to reflect lower activity levels going forward.” Layoffs at three of the big oil and gas service companies are near 60,000 after two of them, Halliburton and Baker Hughes, revealed further layoffs in quarterly filings last week. BP CFO Brian Gilvary told investors Thursday that the company has been cutting workers “and I think you’ll see more of that before we get to the end of the year.” BP’s oil and gas profit dropped 64 percent from April through June. Exxon Mobil’s profit fell by half, to its lowest level since the recession of 2009, the company said Friday. Its operations in the U.S. — the center of the global oil and gas boom — posted its second straight quarterly loss. “The surprise really was here in the U.S.,” said Brian Youngberg, an analyst at Edward Jones. Shares of Exxon and Chevron, both components of the 20-member Dow Jones Industrial Average, fell 4 percent on Friday after they announced results. The companies are in some ways victims of their own success. A surge in oil and gas production brought on by technological advances and high prices in recent years has flooded the market, sending global prices sharply lower. But geopolitical forces have also increased the pressure on prices. Iranian oil is poised to return the world market after years of sanctions, the Greek debt crisis is reducing economic growth in Europe and a shake-up in Chinese financial markets is reducing demand growth in the world’s second largest oil consumer. After nearly four years near $100 a barrel, the price of oil began slumping a year ago, falling to $43 by March. It surged briefly all the way to $61 in June, but then fell again. Oil traded just above $47 a barrel on Friday. That has translated to sharply lower fuel prices. The U.S. average retail price of gasoline through the first half of the year was 30 percent lower than during the same period last year. On Friday the national average was $2.67 a gallon, 85 cents lower than last year at this time, according to AAA. Retail prices for diesel and heating oil have averaged 27 percent lower than last year, and airlines have posted some of their highest profits in years thanks to lower jet fuel prices. These low prices, along with the pain for the oil industry and pleasure for consumers, are likely to continue for a while, analysts say. There is plenty of oil in storage tanks and the global oil industry has the capacity to produce more if demand picks up. In a report Friday, IHS Energy analysts predict further declines in oil prices. IHS says oil will have to fall into the low $40 range and stay there for “several months” before U.S. production growth slows and the supply glut eases. “It’s not good news for producers,” said IHS Chief Economist Nariman Behravesh. “It’s very good news for U.S. households and consumers.” Jonathan Fahey can be reached at .

National Business

Law books

Why American lawyers revere legal precedence

A lot of things have changed about the practice of law since I began law school in 1986. I finally started to use a word processor for my school papers and I was first introduced to the world of electronic research. Prior to law school (and for a large portion of law school) research meant walking around a library and pulling books off of the shelf. Information was expensive because it had to be printed and bound and shelved and kept track of by the herculean efforts of librarians. I think back to the times when I had stacks of books piled around me as I sifted through book after book. I remember the excitement of the new CD-Roms with Utah case law that came out in the late 1980s — a whole bunch of books on one disk! Now, the information is all free and a few mouse clicks and keystrokes away on Google Scholar. But why has the law been associated with dusty tomes for so many decades? And why are lawyers obsessed with judges’ decisions? In our modern society, we tend to think of laws as rules written down on everything from stone tablets to code books, but this isn’t the reason law students ended up in law libraries. What judges say has a historic connection to the creation of our laws. But isn’t that what legislatures do — create our laws and write down the laws that we are to follow? Yes and no. The written-down statutory law isn’t the true historic foundation of our legal system. Anyone who has ever raised a teenager knows how slippery rulemaking can be. The time and effort necessary to cover every scenario a child might encounter is far beyond the capability of any parent to write down every potential violation in detail. Instead, broad generalizations and basic rules are created and specific instances dealt with accordingly. A general curfew might be in place, but can be adapted for special circumstances. Good parenting shows a consistency in the rulemaking and rule enforcement. In the communities of England in the Middle Ages, the English legal system developed on the same model as parents and teenagers: things happened, judges ruled based on what happened and a general idea of what was accepted and what was wrong become the “law.” This is the legal system that became the common law. In that regard, the lawyers act like perpetual adolescents running around looking for inconsistencies in the judges’/parents’ prior rulings. This explains the long-held legal obsession with the law library. Rather than teenagers, Alex De Tocqueville, in his Democracy in America in 1835, opted to describe lawyers as aristocrats, rather than teenagers, in their striving to understand and enforce judicial decisions: This aristocratic character, which I hold to be common to the legal profession, is much more distinctly marked in the United States and in England than in any other country. This proceeds not only from the legal studies of the English and American lawyers, but from the nature of the law and the position that these interpreters of it occupy in the two countries. The English and the Americans have retained the law of precedents; that is to say, they continue to found their legal opinions and the decisions of their courts upon the opinions and decisions of their predecessors. In the mind of an English or American lawyer, a taste and a reverence for what is old is almost always united with a love of regular and lawful proceedings. The attorney’s reverence for what is old is born out of the ability to predict what the legal system is going to do. Clients are happiest when the attorney can properly predict the ultimate outcome. No matter how much legislatures legislate, there will always be gaps. Our common law heritage requires that judges fill those gaps, and attorneys will rush to the law books (or Google Scholar) to try to convince the judges what precedent says should be done, just like aristocratic teenagers. E. Kent Winward is an Ogden attorney. He can be reached at 801-392-8200 or

Minimum Wage-1

Higher wages a surprising success for Seattle restaurant

SEATTLE — Menu prices are up 21 percent and you don’t have to tip at Ivar’s Salmon House on Seattle’s Lake Union after the restaurant decided to institute the city’s $15-an-hour minimum wage two years ahead of schedule. It is staff, not diners, who feel the real difference, with wages as much as 60 percent higher than before. One waitress is saving for accounting classes and finding it easier to take weekend vacations, while another server is using the added pay to cover increased rent. Seattle’s law, adopted last year after a strong push from labor and grassroots activists, bumped the city’s minimum wage to $11 beginning April 1, above Washington state’s highest-in-the-nation $9.47. Scheduled increases that depend on business size and benefits will bring the minimum to $15 within four years for large businesses and seven years for smaller ones. There’s little data yet on how the law’s working. “To the extent that we can look at macro patterns, we’re not seeing a problem,” said Seattle Mayor Ed Murray. As Washington, D.C., and other cities consider following Seattle, San Francisco and Los Angeles in phasing in a $15-an-hour minimum wage, Ivar’s approach, adopted in April, offers lessons in how some businesses might adapt. Ivar’s Seafood Restaurants President Bob Donegan decided to raise prices, tell customers that they don’t need to tip, and parcel the added revenue among the hourly staff. For some of the restaurant’s lesser paid workers — including bussers and dishwashers — that’s meant as much as 60 percent more. Revenue has soared, supportive customers are leaving additional tips even though they don’t need to, and servers and bartenders are on pace to increase their annual pay by thousands, with wages for a few of the best compensated approaching $80,000 a year. “It’s been a surprise,” Donegan said. “The customers seem to like it, the employees seem to like it, and it seems to be working, at least in this location.” Rochelle Hann, 25, is a second-generation worker at Ivar’s. Like her mom, she has performed a variety of roles, including serving, bookkeeping and even dressing up as a giant clam. If she keeps working 30 hours a week, her annual pay will jump about $12,000 — money she’s socking away for accounting classes at a community college. “Before, I felt like it was maybe not quite paycheck-to-paycheck, but now I don’t even have to worry about it,” she said. “I just went away for the weekend, and it was an easy expense.” Brett Richards, a 50-year-old singer and guitarist, has worked 25 years in food service, including the past eight at Ivar’s. Before, he made minimum wage, plus tips. Now, he gets $15 an hour, plus a share of the 21 percent menu price increase, plus any additional tips customers leave. He expects to make almost $7,000 more this year, money that’s helping him with his increased rent and with taking his kids out to eat a little more often. Other industries with minimum wage employees could have a tougher time as worker pay climbs. “What we expect to observe is this is not going to be a policy that’s universally good for everybody or bad for everybody,” said Jacob Vigdor, a University of Washington professor who is leading a study of Seattle’s minimum wage law. The study includes recurring surveys of 700 Seattle businesses and ongoing interviews with about 50 low-wage workers and their families. Downtown Emergency Services Center, which relies heavily on government contracts to provide housing and other services for chronically homeless residents, might need to cut those services unless the city boosts its funding. “The economic justice that would be happening for our employees would be borne by our clients, who are extremely vulnerable people,” said executive director Daniel Malone. In the restaurant industry, where many low-wage workers are employed, adapting could mean pooling tips among all workers, cutting shifts or relying on technology — such as mobile phone applications that let customers pay electronically, rather than having someone dedicated to running the cash register. “This last jump wasn’t that far out of market so it didn’t require a lot of reworking of the financials,” says Anthony Anton, president of the Washington Restaurant Association. “Those second and third jumps will be much bigger jumps. Everyone is talking about what to do.” At Ivar’s Salmon House, decorated with century-old, hand-carved canoes and tribal art, Donegan attributes at least some of his pay policy’s success to Seattle’s white-hot economy. Looking out the broad windows of the dining room across Lake Union, diners can take in pleasure boats and kayaks cruising by, seaplanes landing, the Space Needle — and across the water, the ever-growing Amazon campus that has brought tens of thousands of workers to the city in the past few years. The restaurant’s revenue is up 20 percent, said Donegan, who served on the mayoral committee that drafted the minimum wage law. A few other table-service restaurants have started following suit, and Donegan said he gets inquiries every day from owners wondering how Ivar’s policy is working. But the approach is unlikely to be replicated among fast food restaurants or others where servers make less in tips — even though New York City is making $15 an hour the minimum wage for fast food chains. Even Ivar’s isn’t expanding its new policy to its quick-service seafood stands. Follow Johnson at

Digital Life Review Microsoft Windows 10

Microsoft beats Google in closely watched patent royalty fight

SAN FRANCISCO — Microsoft Corp. won an appeals court ruling that may lower the rates many electronics makers pay to license technology considered standard in smartphones and computers. An appeals court in San Francisco Thursday upheld a $14.5 million jury verdict against Google Inc. as punishment for unfairly demanding what Microsoft said amounted to billions of dollars for use of patents covering Wi-Fi and video downloads. The decision gives new ammunition to companies like Apple, Intel Corp. and Hewlett-Packard which have waged a worldwide campaign to lower the amount of money they pay for essential technologies that let mobile phones download video, access Wi-Fi or accept calls no matter the manufacturer. “This ruling is a win for consumers, competition, and innovation,” said Charles Duan, a lawyer with consumer group Public Knowledge, which backed Microsoft. “It keeps prices reasonable for old products and allows new products to come to the marketplaces.” The court upheld a jury decision that Google’s Motorola breached its obligation to license the patents on fair and reasonable terms. The obligation came because they are part of industry standards that Motorola helped develop. The technology industry, which is split over patent policies, has been watching this case closely for guidance on how to value standardized technology. Regulators and courts on three continents have been wrangling with the issue of whether there are different rules for such patents compared with those related to inventions that are unique to a specific product. The developers of fundamental technology in the wireless industry, including Qualcomm Inc., Ericsson and Nokia, have argued they need compensation for the billions they poured into research that consumers now take for granted. Companies often get together to develop standardized technology so products can work together. Since they have the advantage of ensuring their inventions become part of the standard, they agree to license any relevant patents on fair reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, known as FRAND. Google got the case as part of its 2012 purchase of Motorola Mobility. It’s since sold the handset business but retained most of the patents. Caroline Matthews, a spokeswoman for Google, said the company had no comment on the court decision. The case dates back to 2010. Microsoft argued that Motorola, then a stand-alone company, violated its commitment by demanding a 2.25 percent cut of sales of the XBox video-game system and Windows products for using its Wi-Fi and video- compression patents. Microsoft claimed the request was exorbitant and would amount to $4 billion a year. Microsoft spokesman David Cuddy declined to comment on the appeals court ruling. Motorola, which made the demand after Microsoft sought royalties on its handsets, said the 2.25 percent was its usual opening gambit in licensing talks. It said Microsoft just didn’t want to negotiate. When Microsoft refused to pay, Motorola asked courts to shut down sales. Microsoft was forced to move its distribution center out of Germany before District Judge James Robart in Seattle said Motorola couldn’t get any sales bans while the royalty fight was pending. In 2013, after Google’s acquisition of Motorola, Robart determined the patents were worth a small fraction of what the company had sought. He looked at the value of the patents added to the standard and compared the rate to that collected by patent pools, where a number of companies combine their patents and charge a set fee. The jury, using Robart’s valuation, found that Motorola had breached its contractual obligations to license its patents on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms. After Robart’s ruling, other judges began copying his analysis for their own cases. The appeals court on Thursday upheld Robart’s analysis of how to calculate the correct royalty rate, and the jury’s use of that information. It also said Microsoft was entitled to compensation for having to move its German facility to the Netherlands and the legal costs to ensure it didn’t have to stop selling any of its products. “The jury’s verdict was supported by substantial evidence, and its damages award was proper,” the three-judge appeals court panel ruled.


Clearfield and Farr West pace the state in home sales

Home buying was up 19 percent statewide in the second quarter, led by Clearfield and Farr West, the Salt Lake Board of Realtors said. Clearfield marked 312 homes sold and Farr West 294. Layton also was in the top 10, with 199 sales. “Home buyers appear drawn to affordable areas. In fact, seven of the top 10 cities making the list had home prices lower than their respective county’s median home price,” said Dave Robison, president of the Salt Lake Board of Realtors. In the second quarter, sales of single-family homes along the Wasatch Front increased 19 percent to 8,411 sales, up from 7,059 sales in the second quarter of 2014. At 29 percent, Tooele County posted the highest percent increase in home sales. In Salt Lake County, home sales climbed 16 percent. Utah, Davis and Weber counties also posted double-digit gains. The median-priced home sold along the Wasatch Front increased to $253,000, up 9 percent compared to $231,900 in the second quarter of 2014.