12-05-08  »  Most Views: 2009 Sundamnce Film Festival announces... (65 views)  |  Most Comments: We are one nation; let's support... (27 Comments)


Home » News RSS Icon » Story View

Ogden school board rebukes lawmakers

Bookmark and Share...



Add News Feed to...

AddThis Feed Button

Thursday, August 28, 2008  |  10 Comments [ View ]

By BROOKE NELSON
Standard-Examiner Staff


RESOLUTION LETTER:  Board of Education of Ogden City School District Resolution 2008-07

OGDEN -- A resolution reprimanding the Utah Legislature for poor policy and requesting a change to charter schools was unanimously supported by the Ogden City School Board.

"I think every taxpayer in the state should be aggravated by this," said board member and resolution author Brad Smith.

A provision in Senate Bill 2 currently requires school districts to give a portion of property taxes to charter schools.

This money is in addition to funds redirected from school districts for every student that attends a charter school.

"Charter schools are great. I think charter schools should be funded. I think there should be a capital funding mechanism for charter schools," Smith said. "I just think it's unfair the Legislature can say to the school districts, 'You raise the taxes and we'll tell you where to put them.' "

The idea to send a resolution to local policymakers asking them to rescind the provision originated at a board meeting earlier this month at which a slight tax increase was debated, and barely passed, to raise the $132,000 lost to charter schools.

The resolution makes it clear the board intends to keep the promise it made to taxpayers when a $95.3 million bond passed in 2006 to keep taxes at a certain level, and the recent tax increase would not have passed except for Senate Bill 2.

The resolution also reminds the Legislature that when charter schools were approved, school districts were promised they would not lose funding.

Smith described the bill as "inverse taxation without representation."

"The problem is the Legislature has passed along a cost to the local school boards to fund charter schools," Smith said. "It's unfair to put an expense on the taxpayers of the district for entities that the taxpayers in the district never have any say in who runs them."

The resolution will be signed by board president Don Belnap and will be distributed to local and state government officials and elected representatives, local media and school boards and administrators throughout the state over the next few days.

"I believe there are others who have similar thoughts," Belnap said. "Maybe it will encourage them to take similar action."

Smith said the vote to approve Senate Bill 2 was especially frustrating because a similar bill, House Bill 278, had failed just a short time earlier.

"What changed in between then?" he said.





 10 Comments

By: DS @ 08/30/2008, 10:40 PM

Please people. You need to understand two very important things. First, when a student leaves a district school for a charter, the district does NOT receive any state funding for that student and they DON'T tax for those students on a local level. Now they have to do that in order to give money to the charter schools. Since not one citizen voted on whether to open a charter school in your district, including your voted representative board members, it is taxation without representation. The place that this money should come from is a STATE property tax levy, but then our legislature is very good at making the local boards do their dirty work.

This was a courageous act for the Ogden board to take.

By: Joel @ 08/28/2008, 10:59 PM

Just like the public ed bureaucrats to confuse the issue with their myopia. charter schools just might be the only hope of rescuing the faltering public ed system, but without integrity in the dialogue these district school boards seem hell bent to keep the titanic sinking. the charter schools are the only ones in the public ed system that seem to be willing to come to the table honestly. In order to get a fair ongoing formula (leaving most of the student money in the school the charter students don't even attend any more) the charter folks took a big funding HIT last year. Naturally, the reasonable and fair progress is never satisfactory for the educrats, though. Ogden's rhetoric makes me sick.

By: Paul @ 08/28/2008, 9:07 PM

Maybe we should cut some administrative salaries --$130,000 dollars for a school bus administrator -give me a break!

By: Jack @ 08/28/2008, 7:49 PM

Here's what Ogden SD is asking: Let's tax parents to pay for the education of their children. If we aren't providing the education that their child needs, they can go somwehere else, and we'll keep their money. We don't need to build the schools to educate those kids, so now we have pure profit every time a student transfers to charters. We get smaller classes, and people in Tooele get to pay for it. Awesome for us.

SB2 is great because it puts the cost of the education on those who benefit.

By: Kim @ 08/28/2008, 7:22 PM

The reality is that when a taxpaying parent decides that a traditional school cannot meet the needs of their student they have a responsibility to find a school that does. In some cases a charter is chosen.

When that child leaves his district school approx. 75% of the money STAYS at the district he left. Only 25% follows the student to the charter. The parents still have to pay 100%.

Why are the districts complaining, looks like a great deal for them, no student, 75% of the money.

By: Darren Beck @ 08/28/2008, 6:49 PM

People please! The reality is that school districts are getting money for kids they do not educate; charter kids are funded through the state, not on the backs of the poor districts. Make sure to get ALL the facts.

By: SAC @ 08/28/2008, 11:33 AM

Who's money is it? Didn't the Ogden SD levy the taxes in the first place to pay for public education? There are a minimum of 1000 students from the Ogden SD attending charter schools. Doesn't it just make sense that some of the money levied should follow the students. Their parents pay taxes for public schools and charter schools are public schools. The Ogden SD is acting like its their money. They should at the very least have reduced the tax levy to the taxpayer to offset the 1000 or more students who they no longer have in their schools.
Give me a break.

By: JB @ 08/28/2008, 9:48 AM

I totally agree with the Ogden School Board. The Legislature forces the local school boards to either raise taxes or cut services to fund charter schools. Schools that the local boards have no say in establishing or operating.

By: Dubya @ 08/28/2008, 8:30 AM

Respecting schools that educate children is one thing. Taking money from the lowest funded public education system in the country and giving it to another education system that duplicates what already exists is another. That's like saying McDonalds should hand over some of its operating budget to Burger KIng because Burger King wants a "level" playing field.

By: John @ 08/28/2008, 7:15 AM

Given the amount of taxes that already goes into the educational system, aggrivates me. Brad speaks as though he works in the educational system, all they think about is more money for themselves. Disregarding the needs of all the other government programs, maybe the the answer is toll schools, kind of a user pay idea, but then like toll roads you get worse roads and make your friends rich. So maybe we ought to respect all forms of schooling that achieves the goal of educating our children....maybe that's too simple.


Add Your Comment


Name:
Comment:
Security Code:
Type the characters to the left in the box exactly as they appear.










www.utahcouponpower.com


Sign up for local savings, special offers, deals and coupons!

E-mail Address:




View All » Local Jobs

Sales Representative

Seasonal Tax Preparer/Accountant

Mig Welder

Hair Stylist

Sr. Project Coordinator
Ogden City

Scratch Baker
Dan's Foods

LPN/RN
Island View RTC

Server
Tepanyaki

Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)
Brigham City Nursing and Rehabilitation

Hostess
Tepanyaki