12-05-08  »  Most Views: Bringing in the Bookmobile / West... (18 views)  |  Most Comments: We are one nation; let's support... (27 Comments)


Home » News RSS Icon » Story View

Many employers prohibit visible tattoos and body piercings on the job

Bookmark and Share...



Add News Feed to...

AddThis Feed Button

Story Photos

Paige Ansley, a motor clothes consultant at the Golden Spike Harley Davidson dealer in Ogden, shows off her tattoos. DJAMILA GROSSMAN/Standard-Examiner



Sunday, September 7, 2008  |  17 Comments [ View ]

By JESSE FRUHWIRTH
Standard-Examiner Davis Bureau


At the counter of Lucky Bamboo Tattoo stood a woman with a fresh business-ready haircut, modest makeup, a Sesame Street diaper bag, smart jeans, a conservative shirt and a wide-eyed baby on her hip. She said she's the kind of woman who wants it all: the kids, the career, the tongue piercing.

The 23-year-old Kaysville receptionist, also tattooed on the back of her neck and back, was told by her boss to get rid of her tongue piercing, or at least use a clear glass piece of jewelry to fill it.

She says her boss's request is petty.

"Just because you have tattoos or piercings doesn't mean you can't do your job," said the woman, who asked that her name not be used for fear her boss might be offended.

The woman's employer actually is more lenient than many.

Workplaces as diverse as the military, hospitals, police departments, courts and many private companies have policies forbidding visible tattoos and piercings while on the job.

Several tattooed employees contacted for this article said they would not talk about them because they feared workplace repercussions.

Bountiful recently joined the list of tattoo- and piercing-restrictive work environments. Bountiful Mayor Joe Johnson confirmed the policy applies equally to the mayor and police as well as lawn mowers and the custodian who empties the mayor's garbage. Women may have earrings.

"If you have a tattoo that's not on your face, neck or hands, that's fine. When you work, you cover it," Johnson said. "When you go home, if you want to put an earring in, that's fine, but when you're working, you're working for us."

Johnson avoided the question of what precisely is unsuitable about tattoos or piercings in the workplace. He said repeatedly that people with tattoos aren't bad people and that he has friends with tattoos. The policy can be revised if it becomes a problem, he said.

A 2003 Harris Interactive online poll may explain why employers discourage body modifications.

Fifty-seven percent of respondents without tattoos said those with them are more rebellious. Around a third said those with them also are less attractive (42 percent), less sexy (36 percent), less intelligent (31 percent) and less spiritual (29 percent).

By comparison, 20 percent with tattoos said their body art made them feel more spiritual. Thirty-four percent said they feel more sexy. Fewer than a third said their tattoos made them feel more rebellious or attractive.

Jared Preslar, owner of Layton's Lucky Bamboo Tattoo, said he predicts anxiety about tattoos will subside as body modification infiltrates Utah's mainstream, a process he said has already begun.

"I tattoo LDS people almost every day and that's been a big difference from 10 years ago," Preslar said. "We even have people say their bishop approved it."

Body modification remains primarily a movement of the young.

A 2006 survey by Pew Research found 36 percent of people ages 18 to 25 have tattoos, while 40 percent of those 26 to 40 have one.

In the 41 to 64 years old group, only 10 percent had a tattoo.

"We're a bold bunch," said 47-year-old retired cop Paige Ansley of the over-40 tattooed crowd. Ansley's had tattoos for years, but they were not visible while on-duty with the Riverdale Police Department. Now she's free to ink-up at her job at Golden Spike Harley-Davidson in Ogden.

The tattoos are "permanent jewelry" that symbolize significant times in her life.

Ansley said policies like Bountiful's are understandable -- though she doesn't like them -- because they are working for and within a very conservative community. She obligingly covered her tattoos as a police officer, but a new piece of art on her forearm is difficult to cover.

"It's a compass rose, a nautical compass," she said. "I just got it this year. I was in law enforcement for 23 years, then I had to make a complete change in direction, so it's a compass about direction and staying the course."

While older tattooed workers may be resigned to hiding their ink at work, younger body modifiers are threatening to buck the status quo.

Tia Pendleton, 19, of Ogden, is tattooed all over and unrepentant about her ink. As an aspiring photographer or interior designer, she admits her body modifications -- including a piercing through her top lip -- may hinder her job search, but that won't stop her.

"Thinking of trying to find another job will be hard with all these tattoos, but I plan to get more," she said.

A tattoo that says DREAMS decorates her wrist, and flowers and stars dot her arms and back. The possible irony that Pendleton's conspicuous DREAMS tattoo could one day hinder her reaching her dreams is not lost on her, but it's a sacrifice she's willing to make.

"It reminds me of goals, things I want to accomplish," she said. "It reminds me to work on them every day ... but I worry about it (employers disliking it) all the time."

Curt Stewart, spokesman for Utah Workforce Services, said no one he spoke to in his bureau is aware of a "widespread panic from employers regarding tattoos" or piercings. Most businesses that use the service are seeking entry-level employees.

Stewart said job counselors at the service give little advice about tattoos and one in particular says nothing to people who couldn't cover them up.

"Basically she doesn't say much about their tattoos unless they're totally offensive," he said. "She urges sometimes to cover up, but as you know, there's a lot of people that can't hide them when they're going up the side of the neck. It's becoming a fact of the workplace in that respect."

Workforce Services' online grooming brochure coaches on fresh breath and neat hair, but also does not address tattoos or piercings.

Cal Udy, a labor relations representative with the American Federation of Teachers, represents school workers, including teachers and bus drivers, and is aware of any formal tattoo policy at school districts.

"If they went after one of my members with a tattoo, I'd fight back," he said. "Because I think they're violating civil rights. ... If (employers) want to tell (employees) what they can wear, let them furnish the uniform, but don't tell me how I can wear my hair or whether I can have a tattoo."

Anti-discrimination director Heather Morrison at the Utah Labor Commission said religious rights are the only ones recognized in protecting body modifications.

"Employers are very comfortable with making a disability accommodation, but they're equally required to make a religious accommodation on an as-needed basis," she said.

Religious accommodations for tattoos or piercings may not be needed very often, however, as few mainstream religions forbid the covering of tattoos, Morrison said.

Only a few lesser-known religions may fall into that category.

In 2005, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers paid $125,000 in a court settlement with an employee who challenged the anti-tattoo policy on religious grounds. The server's religion was Kemet, a revival of ancient Egyptian spirituality.

The server argued that covering up his tattoos -- even at work -- is sacrilege in his faith. The judge affirmed the case for trial, but it was settled days before a jury was to decide whether the policy violated his religious rights.

Public and private employers -- Morrison said anti-discrimination laws apply identically to both -- may want to write an explicit religious exception into their policy, but it's not required.

Attorney Brian Barnard, a standard bearer of civil rights lawsuits in Utah, agreed businesses have a right to make appearance demands from employees. He also agreed that an employee's religion is probably the only factor that might force an employer to make an accommodation.

"(Body modification) is a matter of choice, a matter of appearance and it would not implicate employment policies," he said. "In this day and age, one would have to question the wisdom of such a (policy), but it's not unconstitutional."





 17 Comments

By: Nikki @ 11/25/2008, 10:39 AM

I think people should not judge poeple because of their tattoos or piercings, I want snakebite piercings and i know it won't affect my work rate or productivity. If you have a tattoo/piercing be proud of it! Stand up for what you believe in! Don't judge...

By: Jake @ 09/24/2008, 9:42 AM

Jay, thank you for laughing at my comment that God Has not Changed. You're wonderful! All that Medical attention mumbo jumbo makes no sense. God did not creat medical attention or artificial hearts or anything like that. Man created those things. God allowed it yes, because he loves us and wants us to progress. We will continue to progress in this life and the life to come. God remains constant. His love is Constant. His Commandments are constant. His principles are constant. We do receive revalation today as those of the bible did. He reveals things as the times change and man changes, but he does not change! And as for the rest of the stuff you say about Christians or any religion. Judge not, lest ye shall be judged. If people believe everyone in Utah is judgemental and it's because of their religion, then I'm sorry you don't see it from any other point but your own. If you don't like Utah, or the people there, why don't you leave? No one is making you stay there. Freedom of choice, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of speech... all blessings we have because of the founding fathers. And were those founding fathers not Christian? This country was created on Religion and Christianity. I'm done, it's pointless to try and convince someone who is not ready to listen.

By: UtefromWayBack @ 09/09/2008, 8:34 PM

seriously - you people think that it's some kind of inalienable right to 'express' yourself anywhere anytime? If you want to tatoo your face - that's cool, but don't expect everyone to consider hiring you. I have nothing against tatoos - other than I generally think they're pretty trashy looking, but for Christ's sake, don't make me look at your tat all day long. It's not as though these people are saying you can't have a tatoo, or a piercing - they're simply saying we don't want to see it. Well, I'm a young female, not an old fogey - and I'm not religious at all, so no God story here, but quit your whining and cover up your trash. If I want to look at art, I'll go to the museum. If I want to look at tats, I'll go to the park in the summer.

By: Jay @ 09/09/2008, 12:19 PM

The first comment on here is so ridiculous that I had to laugh....god hasn’t changed??? Well I have news for you; all of that medical attention you have received or will receive is not natural also so you better stop artificial hearts, hips and cartridge to name a few. I live in Utah and I can tell you that the general public is some of the most judgmental people you would ever meet and thank religion for that one. You say you are a Christian? Better go read your good book again because I don’t see how you are close to being a good one! Tattoos have been around long before religion/Christianity and I hate to say it but religion causes a lot more problems than tattoos by far...ever heard of a tattoo war??? As far as Obama goes and the employers that are so ignorant they can’t see 5 feet in front of them...I feel bad for you as you will soon be forced to change as change is the only thing that is constant and the time for it is upon you. You can sit back and have you’re small minded opinions on body art but that wont change anything as more and more people are getting them! Accept it and grow up!

By: Jake @ 09/08/2008, 2:55 PM

Alright where do I even start here. Let's face it, Tattoos, Piercings and any body modifications are all some form of expression. Whether it's someone lonely that wants attention, people to look at them, or just someone expressing themselves, showing off who they are, or what they believe. In todays world, most states, most countries, and most places, they are acceptable (emphasis on "today's world") The times have changed, the world has changed... God has not changed. If God intended for us to have tattoos or exotic piercings, we would have been born with them. Still, we should not judge people for having tattoos or piercings, as there are plenty of good people in this world that have them. Sometimes it's necessary to have rules, not matter where you live, against showing piercings or tattoos, they can be considered offensive to many people. It seems that people who are covered in them, are the only ones that do not believe this, or simply don't care. We all have freedom of beliefs, religion, speech, all the wonderful freedoms created by the founding fathers! Let us not pass judgement on people with them, or without them. We're all created equal. Anyway that passes judgement on people in Utah or laws in utah, are just as guilty as people in Utah passing judgement on other people. Every company has to stand for what it believes in, and if not showing tattoos or piercing is part of that... let it be that way, deal with it or don't work there. The same goes for places that encourage Body modifications, if you don't have them, or feel strongly against them, don't work there. Why must everyone Judge?

By: epifan daniel @ 09/08/2008, 10:46 AM

www.TattooCulture.us here you can find everything about Tattoo and Piercing

By: 3boysmama @ 09/08/2008, 9:24 AM

Paige,
You look beautiful!!!!! Lucky you..you get to be yourself(Finally!)

By: Mia @ 09/08/2008, 6:42 AM

I go to the same grocery store every two weeks. I choose the fast and friendly clerks that don't get irritated that I want to bag my own groceries in my own bags. There is one clerk that is so slow and not tattooed that I will not go through her line if she is the only clerk working. I will check my own groceries instead.

By: ashaw0805 @ 09/07/2008, 10:48 PM

Tatoos should not limit your right to work and take care of your family. Which looks better, an unoffensive visible tatoo or a big old bandage up the side of your neck covering something that in all likely holds means something to you. People choose all sorts of ways to express themselves, be it clothing, peircing tatoos or jewlery and who are we to say they are right or wrong. I am LDS and I can tell you from experience that right or wrong good or bad only in Utah would this have the impact it has. Our forefathers fought for the right of ALL of us to be ourselves and I say shame on those employers who are trying to make everyone into cookie cutters of themselves. I have been a manager of a resturant for 7 years, I have a visible tatoo and it in now way impacts my professionalism, my customer service, or my intelligence and shame on anyone who thinks otherwise. This is the land of the free so stop trying to limit our freedom just because we express ourselves differently than you do or want us to.

By: Keori @ 09/07/2008, 8:41 PM

And these comments are exactly the reason I refuse to live in Utah. Land of the free, my foot; this is the land of the stupid, ignorant, and proud of it.

Since when has a person's body modification or tattoo dictated - or was even a reliable indicator - of his/her honesty, integrity, work ethic, or intelligence? I'm personally inclined to distrust clean-cut white men in a suit and tie. You know...people who look like Dick Cheney.

By: Stan @ 09/07/2008, 6:16 PM

Until the majority of people in the area, state, nation have tattoos and find it acceptable for others to display them publicly, this will not change.

By: Rik Potter @ 09/07/2008, 5:01 PM

This is discrimination, plain and simple. Unfortunately, it is still legal in some places. I feel sorry for the man who chooses the "clerk with no visible tattoos". Do you think he's going to try and cheat you? You have serious discrimination issues. There are doctors, lawyers and CEO's with visible tattoos. What do you think you're avoiding by only doing business with those who have no visible tattoos?

By: EMT @ 09/07/2008, 1:42 PM

Soooo....let me get this straight. It's the fault of "ALL OF THESE BLACKS MEXICANS ASIANS HISPANICS AND MINORITIES". Then, I'm guessing that you wouldn't hire a military veteran because he has a service tattoo....That you would refuse treatement from a paramedic that has the star of life on his forearm.....you wouldn't let a firefighter with a maltese cross on his shoulder put out the fire at your house or the police officer with a SRT tattoo rescue you because they're all horrible people.
Being retired military and now being in emergency services has taught me that poeple are are people first, their appearance/job/religion/race/etc. second.
Doesn't anyone remember the old saying "Don't judge a book by its cover"?

By: Ben @ 09/07/2008, 1:37 PM

I am a corporate "suit" that works in new product development for a Fortune 400 company. My company embraces the diversity of body modification as a form of self expression. I'm one of many who sport tattoos at work and I'm one of the least extreme ones. Some of our regional corporate managers also wear dreadlocks, full slevee tattoos and piercings. Before you figure that this must be some hip slick marketing company, nope - we're a grocery company you shop at every day. So, KenW, if you choose the plain non-tatooed clerk at the chcekout line, no problem. Plenty of others choose not to discriminate. We need scared suburban types to shop in our stores, too.

By: INGY @ 09/07/2008, 1:21 PM

IT'S ALL OF THESE BLACKS MEXICANS ASIANS HISPANICS AND MINORITIES,,,THEY COME AROUND COVERED IN TATTOOS AND THINK THEY WILL GET ANYTHING THEY WANT,,,WELLL I GOT NEWS FOR THEM YOU WONT! EVEN IF OBAMA BECOMES PRESIDENT YOUR TATTOOS ARE GOING TO BE COVERED IF YOU WORK FOR ME!

By: tacoma @ 09/07/2008, 10:53 AM

what is going on? one or two people don't like something they want to change all of us .
Last time I looked we live in America land of the free.

By: KenW. @ 09/07/2008, 10:23 AM

Given a choice of checkout lines in any store, I will choose one whose clerk bears no visible tatoos, piercing, brands or other disfiguring, self inflicted silliness.
It stands to reason that business is lost because of employee's apearance, so employers have the right, no, responsibility to govern it.


Add Your Comment


Name:
Comment:
Security Code:
Type the characters to the left in the box exactly as they appear.










www.utahcouponpower.com


Sign up for local savings, special offers, deals and coupons!

E-mail Address: