07-04-09  »  Most Views: Top of Utah's Fourth of July... (725 views)  |  Most Comments: Guilty plea in Ponzi case (7 Comments)


Home » News RSS Icon » Story View
Bookmark and Share...



Add News Feed to...

AddThis Feed Button

Friday, November 21, 2008  |  4 Comments [ View ]

Red fading in Utah

"For the times they are a-changin'."

-- Bob Dylan

"Who's the reddest, baddest state of 'em all?" purred the comfortable Utah Republican

"It isn't Utah anymore!" grinned the hopeful Utah Democrat.

Don't be surprised at all those faded Obama signs still on your neighbors' lawns. Red versus blue now means more than just Utes versus Cougars. This past election season, the Beehive State lost its designation as America's reddest -- 'er Republican --state in presidential preference.

Oh sure, McCain beat Obama by 27 points, but McCain won by a even larger margins -- 32 points -- in Oklahoma and Wyoming.

So, you say, "27 ... 32, what's the difference?"

It's a big difference if you recall 2004, when President Bush trounced Democrat Sen. John Kerry by 45.5 percentage points. A margin reduction of more than 18 percentage points in one presidential election cycle is a clear demographic shift.

And here's the biggest news: On Wednesday, after provisional and absentee ballots were tallied, Obama logged more votes in Salt Lake County than McCain. The final result: Obama, 176,988; McCain, 176,692.

Now, we understand Obama's 296-vote Salt Lake County win is only a tiny step toward a Democrat winning statewide. But you can't spin it any way but as a positive for the party. One reason for the success is that many Salt Lake County Democrats did what their Republican counterparts often do in Davis and other Utah counties -- they voted straight party.

It is significant that the Democratic Party's gains in Utah have come with bigger gains in other Western areas. Democrats became the dominant party in Denver, Las Vegas and Albuquerque. Obama also captured the states where those cities are located-- Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico. In 2004, it's recalled, President Bush won those states.

There are many reasons for voters' shifts in the West. There is a growing Hispanic population that sees the GOP as anti-immigrant. Many voters are tired of the Bush administration and its policies. Younger voters' trend is Democrat.

Both parties will adjust to these changes. Republicans are doing a lot of soul-searching. Perhaps some issues -- such as immigration and climate change -- will be re-evaluated. Democrats will work to retain these gains in voters. Utah Democrats may try to carve out a permanent majority in Salt Lake County.

What's certain is that Utah's long-established red-state demographic has faded a little.





 4 Comments

By: Shooter973 @ 11/21/2008, 3:30 PM

I'm not surprised that the Redness of the state is getting diluted. A lot of people have moved here from "more progressive" states like California because their own state is going down the tubes. They sell their home for a lot of money and come here to buy nice homes for s lot less money and because the living conditions here are better.
The living conditions here are better because we have a conservative state Govt. and a balanced budget.
But these people move here and bring their "progressive" politics with them and vote accordingly. They foul the nest the are from and flee to a new one (here) and then start to do the same thing they did back "home".

Report Abuse

By: Blue Lou @ 11/21/2008, 12:56 PM

Hey, Derek.

This is the OPINION page. Nobody's claiming that it's "conjecture disguised as fact". Most reasonably intelligent adults know that the Editorial Opinion is exactly that - - the opinion of the Editor. It's Ok to disagree with his opinion but you're accusing him of intentionally trying to mislead people. Of course, what should we accept from someone who readily admits he didn't vote simply because his first preference wasn't on the ballot. In some countries, people have to dodge sniper fire and threats to get to the polls, but you were in a snit so, like a petulant 4th grader, you took your ball and went home. And look what happened, because you stayed away, you ended up with the President that, I'm guessing, you like the least.

Karma bites you in the butt everytime, Derek.

Report Abuse

By: DontCooperateWithTheState @ 11/21/2008, 10:49 AM

Libertarian candidates also enjoyed higher vote percentages compared to past elections.

But don't expect the statist media to report on anything that happens outside of the two-party duopoly.

Report Abuse

By: Derek Monson @ 11/21/2008, 10:48 AM

There was one thing in this article that is incontrovertible:

"you can't spin [the 2008 election outcome] any way but as a positive for the [Democratic] party."

The rest of the article, however, is only so much opinion and conjecture disguised as fact. For example:

"A margin reduction of more than 18 percentage points in one presidential election cycle is a clear demographic shift."

If you haven't looked into the reality of the election in Utah, this might seem to make sense. However, once you realize that voter turnout in Utah was down six percentage points this cycle compared to 2008, and then consider the fact that Sen. McCain was a huge letdown as a candidate in a conservative state that was hoping to have Mitt Romney on the ticket, then the signs of a "demographic shift" start to become a little weaker.

To be clear, my point is not that a demographic shift has not occurred. It's simply that parading that prediction around as common-sense fact is ludicrous given the realities of the election in Utah. The evidence simply doesn't support that level of certainty one way or the other.

Report Abuse


Add Your Comment


Name:
Comment:
Security Code:
Type the characters to the left in the box exactly as they appear.
Before posting you must check the box to agree to our posting guidelines.
Utah Find It

Utah Find It