Lobbyist funds seem like outright bribes

I read in the paper that Utah's U.S. Senator Mike Lee was unsuccessful in his plan to run his own super PAC that would allow him to accept no limit on how much money a donor could contribute (Dec. 2, "Federal election Commission nixes Lee's super PAC funds"). I hope that decision sticks and that Senator Lee and his staff do not figure out how to do an end run and get their way.

Let's face it, if a lobbyist or a company or an individual gives a candidate a ton of money, how can the elected official not be influenced? I would still like someone to explain to me what a lobbyist does that is any different than an outright bribe. It's like the old story about the three accountants applying for a job. When asked what the sum of two and two is, the first guy says "4," the second guy says "5" and the last guy says, "what do you want it to be?" We know who gets the job.

Stan Jacobson

Ogden

Advertisement
  +

Recent Comments

Latest Blogs

Blogging the Rambler
Herbert, who hates all things fed, demands more fed...
By: Charles Trentelman

Thursday, March 28, 2013 - 3:58pm

The Political Surf
Baptisms for health were once more common than...
By: Doug Gibson

Monday, June 10, 2013 - 2:00pm

Me, myself... as mommy
Girls shouldn’t be called bossy — they just show ‘...
By: MeganSanders

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 - 12:08am

Why Are You Crying?
Legislative marriage counselors
By: Mark Shenefelt

Tuesday, February 26, 2013 - 4:37pm

Standard-Examiner Sports Blogs
Weber State, Ogden City to honor “special guest” from...
By: Roy Burton

Wednesday, May 1, 2013 - 12:37pm

Latest Tweets