Defense: Facts, competency unrelated in Smart case

SALT LAKE CITY -- Defense attorneys for the man charged in the 2002 abduction of Elizabeth Smart say the issue of his legal mental competency is unrelated to the facts of the case.

Court papers filed Monday in U.S. District Court by attorneys for Brian David Mitchell say a judge could agree that Mitchell had kidnapped Smart, but still find him incompetent to stand trial.

The papers were filed in connection with a December hearing to determine Mitchell's competency.

Federal prosecutors say testimony from Smart and others about Mitchell's behavior and statements confirms their premise that he is faking mental illness to avoid prosecution.

Mitchell's attorneys maintain that he is incompetent.

U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball will ultimately decide whether Mitchell is fit to stand trial.

 

Advertisement
  +

Recent Comments

Latest Blogs

Blogging the Rambler
Leg fighting Clear Air? So much for common sense
By: Charles Trentelman

Friday, February 10, 2012 - 4:34pm

The Political Surf
Judges are tailoring gay marriage opinion to appeal to...
By: Doug Gibson

Wednesday, February 8, 2012 - 2:36pm

Me, myself... as mommy
Death call
By: MeganSanders

Tuesday, January 31, 2012 - 2:53pm

Why Are You Crying?
No economic crisis in college football
By: Mark Shenefelt

Monday, December 12, 2011 - 11:36am

Standard-Examiner Sports Blogs
Memo to NBA coaches: Overlook Millsap and Jefferson at...
By: Jim Burton

Saturday, February 11, 2012 - 12:38am

Latest Tweets



Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement


Advertisement

Online Polls

How does all the recent violent, crime news make you feel?