WASHINGTON —
President Barack Obama is turning his attention to the nation's crushing
debt and trying to counter a Republican anti-deficit plan with a
framework of his own that tackles politically sensitive health care
programs while also increasing taxes. The president on Wednesday
was to deliver a speech outlining his proposal to reduce spending in
Medicare and Medicaid, raise taxes on the wealthy and cut defense costs.
In a pre-emptive response Tuesday, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio,
called any proposed tax increase "a nonstarter." The White
House wouldn't offer details of the president's approach ahead of the
speech. But an official commenting on the condition of anonymity said
the plan borrows from the December recommendations of Obama's bipartisan
fiscal commission, which proposed $4 trillion in deficit reduction over
10 years. In a preview, the White House said the speech aims to
achieve "balanced" deficit reduction by keeping domestic spending low,
reducing the defense budget, cutting excess health care spending in the
nation's biggest benefit programs, and eliminating loopholes and breaks
in the tax system. Obama's address will draw contrasts with a
Republican plan that cuts $5 trillion in spending over the next decade
and which the White House says unfairly singles out middle-class
taxpayers, older adults and the poor. This new clash, just a week
after the president announced he would seek re-election, ensures that
the nation's fiscal health will be at the center of the 2012
presidential campaign. For the past two months, Obama has been arguing
to protect his core spending priorities, including education and
innovation. His turn to deficit reduction reflects the pressures he
faces in a divided Congress and with a public increasingly anxious about
the nation's debt, now exceeding $14 trillion. The president is
wading into a potential political thicket. Liberals fear he will propose
cuts in prized Democratic programs like Medicare and Medicaid, the
health care programs for older adults, the disabled and the poor, and in
Social Security. Moderates worry that his plan could unravel bipartisan
deficit-cutting negotiations. And Republicans already are poised to
reject any proposal that includes tax increases. For the White
House, the speech at George Washington University comes as Obama pushes
Congress to raise the limit on the national debt, which will permit the
government to borrow more and thus meet its financial obligations. The
country will reach its debt limit of $14.3 trillion by May 16. The
Treasury Department has warned that failure to raise it by midsummer
would drive up the cost of borrowing and destroy the economic recovery. Obama will brief Congress' bipartisan leadership in the contents of his speech Wednesday morning at the White House. His
speech comes just before Congress votes on a $38 billion package of
spending cuts that averted a government shutdown last week. Despite
widespread antipathy toward the deal in both parties, House Republicans
and the White House predicted the plan, which covers spending for the
next six months, would pass. As for the bigger, long-term deficit
proposal, the White House was keeping a tight lid on details. But
spokesman Jay Carney made clear the president would call for changes in
Medicare and Medicaid. Obama also was expected to resurrect the tax
increases on wealthy Americans that he put off in December as part of a
tax deal with Congress. "He believes that there has to be a
balanced approach" to reducing long-term deficits, Carney said. "And
that's entitlements, tax expenditures and defense." The
president's proposal is meant to be in sharp contrast with the plan
offered by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan., R-Wis. That
budget proposal, embraced by the House Republican leadership, would
reduce spending by more than $5 trillion over 10 years with structural
overhauls to Medicare and Medicaid while also making permanent all
Bush-era tax cuts. Obama could face resistance from Democrats.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., on Tuesday reiterated his
opposition to changes in Social Security.



Comments