Senior House Democrats are showing two ways to handle a politically dicey remake of the U.S. health-care system.
There's the Chet Edwards way, which is to stand up and put his name next to his intent. In his case, that means defying intense White House lobbying and his party leadership and voting no on the reform bill passed over from the Senate.
Yes, Edwards represents the most Republican-leaning House district held by a Democrat, so we would not dismiss political motivation as he faces what could be a stiff re-election challenge. We would encourage you to not dismiss his stated rationale, that the reform bill -- even with anticipated House "fixes" -- does not do enough to control future costs and reduce the deficit. Those are the same reasons we can't sign on to the massive mishmash of legislation that promises radical changes to one-sixth of the nation's economy.