The last time I wrote about Tina Dupuy, you in invited me to critique her viewpoints as to why I do not feel that she is a good journalist. She wrote a viewpoint, "Its only unethical when it's called 'news'", in the Standard Examiner. I have read this article several times and still do not see her point. I guess the final paragraph is Liberals should mimic Fox News but it is not news and none for the Progressive movement. Which news is she referring to--the Megan Kelly, Baer, Shepard or is it the O"Reilly Factor or Hannity or Glen Beck? Which is she comparing? All news media have their own unique format and promote their agenda to make their case against or for their beliefs and values. Both parties do this!
MSNBC, NBC, CBS,ABC, PBS and CNN have their agenda to promote, i.e., Progressive ideas but lets us call them for they really are and that is the Socialist-Communist-Democratic Party.
The facts that are stated by the Conservatives hosts are for more correct and balanced than the Liberals. This is why we the people prefer to listen to Fox and not the hate, the incorrect, the biased reporting of the others. The American people have the freedom to listen to all but the Liberal viewpoints do not match what America is all about and what so many gave their lives to preserve. If the main street journalists were not biased against the conservative women and blacks and not hide their true agenda i.e., spread the wealth around and big government is good they too would have listeners. The Liberal journalists have this mentality-- they think the conservatives, i.e., most Americans, cling to their Bible, guns and are stupid red neck!
Her article does not have any facts but only her feeling which she believes to be true and all should be like her.