Barker Park amphitheater construction (copy)

The North Ogden residents who sued the city over construction of the Barker Park amphitheater, pictured here on June 26, 2018, have dropped their case, ending the legal tussle. Second District Court Judge Noel Hyde of Ogden dismissed the case on Tuesday Oct. 16, 2018.

OGDEN — The North Ogden residents who sued the city over construction of an amphitheater in a park in their neighborhood have dropped their case, ending the legal tussle.

Second District Court Judge Noel Hyde, who’s based in Ogden, dismissed the case Tuesday after the two sides reached accord to end the legal fight, filed by three couples last February as work on the new facility was still underway.

The city of North Ogden asked that the neighbors pay the city’s legal costs, around $13,000, after Hyde ruled last May against their call for a temporary court order to halt the amphitheater work. Per the agreement to resolve the case, though, each side will handle its own legal fees.

RELATED: Ogden judge rejects call for halt to North Ogden amphitheater construction

Construction of the amphitheater in Barker Park, launched in late 2017, has been a heated topic in North Ogden. Aaron Christensen, his wife and two other couples filed their suit, worried the new entertainment venue, replacing a much smaller amphitheater, would bring noise and disruption to their quiet residential neighborhood. They filed their suit only after officials approved project plans and work commenced, questioning the procedure city leaders followed in bringing the project to fruition.

City officials countered, saying they took all key actions leading up to the amphitheater’s construction in public and did everything legally. The public had opportunity to sound off before work began.

Still, Jon Call, the city attorney, said North Ogden officials come out of the legal brouhaha with a changed outlook on how to pursue such projects.

“I think the city is going to work harder on trying to get the word out on larger projects like this one. I do think the city did a good job of trying new ways to get the word out, but it wasn’t always heard by those who ended up not wanting the project,” Call said in an email Wednesday.

Christensen didn’t immediately respond to a request Wednesday for comment. But Tuesday’s court decision doesn’t necessarily end the debate over the amphitheater.

RELATED: North Ogden’s new $1.85M amphitheater nearly done; some excited, some leery

The first stage of amphitheater work finished last July, with completion of a new stage, covered by a distinctive wavy roof. That cost $1.85 million.

More work is to be done, requiring more money, however, and future steps will likely be a focus of discussion at city hall. The enclosed space behind the stage needs work to turn it into dressing rooms, storage space and more, while plans also call for new sound and lighting systems.

“City staff is currently preparing information for the council to consider what amount, if any, they would like to put towards finishing the inside of the amphitheater building,” Call said. City staffers had originally included $700,000 in the 2019 city budget to cover the cost of additional work, but it “was removed at the council’s request until more details could be gathered.”

Officials have also been debating the guidelines that will govern use of the amphitheater, aiming to be mindful of the concerns of neighbors.

Contact reporter Tim Vandenack at tvandenack@standard.net, follow him on Twitter at @timvandenack or like him on Facebook at Facebook.com/timvandenackreporter.

(1) comment

gregoryunderscore

Why didn't the city reach out to these residents first? Why was alternative locations that could better handle traffic flow not discussed? Why did the city go to the Barker Family for negotiations only to slander them at the last minute? Why is the Amphitheater planning on only event next year? Why did they go with a 4 million dollar stage and not the typical open amph setup at 500k used across the nation? Why did they not disclose the other bids and go straight we the costly wadman bid? Why was there no study on yearly operational costs and upkeep before building? Why did Brent Taylor BAN residents who where against the project to follow his facebook page? Why did Brent Taylor ban posts on his page where those against the amphitheater wanted to let the community know they were NOT against the play and the arts, further stoking a unneeded divide in the community? POOR leadership & POOR management.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.