OGDEN — Two Weber State University employees and an engineer have filed to run for the Ogden School Board of Education District 4 seat. The trio will face off at the June 26 primaries.

Sunni Wilkinson, Iain Hueton and Sheldon Cheshire are all running for office for the first time. The two candidates with the most votes will appear on the November ballot. The District 4 seat is currently occupied by Jeff Heiner, Ogden School Board of Education president.

Cheshire, 43, is the coordinator of leadership programs at Weber State University. He said the $106.5 million bond that failed last year was one of the reasons he decided to run for office. The school board, Cheshire said, was not as transparent as it should have been communicating details of the bond.

He said he would approve of a new bond that “will actually meet the needs of the students.” If elected, he said he wants to figure out why Ogden School District is losing so many students.

“As a community (we) need to be able to start discussing what are the reasons why parents are not sending their kids to Ogden City schools,” Cheshire said. “We are losing the students because we are losing the teachers.”

Wilkinson, 40, is an English adjunct professor at Weber State. If elected, she said she will make equality and access to education her main priorities.

“I think all students in the district should have access to nice facilities, high quality teachers and technology, and small, manageable classes,” Wilkinson said. “For me, the teachers are at the core part of my kids’ education.”

Two of her three sons go to Taylor Canyon Elementary, one of the schools that was part of the school district’s school consolidation plan presented earlier this year. She said school consolidation is also something that sparked an interest in running.

“I think something needs to be done because you have eight of the nine elementary schools getting older now,” Wilkinson said. “It looks like overall the information I’ve been given is that some schools will have to close.”

Hueton, 57, is a product development engineer based in Ogden. He said his desire to protect neighborhood based schools was one of the main reasons why he is running for the first time. He is also concerned about the teacher exodus.

“I don’t feel we are advancing rapidly enough to serve the Ogden community,” Hueton said. “We lose an awful lot of people and I see that with friends … that bothers me, that we are losing people and that we haven’t been able to raise our standards.”

He said he’d like to focus more on providing support to teachers in the school district as opposed to just focusing on infrastructure repairments.

“I feel there’s not enough autonomy for teachers to do what they do best: teach,” Hueton said. “It’s teachers that have a direct impact in student success. I think there’s a lot of opportunities to improve how teachers are empowered.”

Contact education reporter Sergio Martínez-Beltrán at smartinezbeltran@standard.net or 801-625-4274. Follow him on Twitter @SergioMarBel and like him on Facebook at Facebook.com/STANDARDEXSergio.

(1) comment

flatlander

And we're off!  First survey of candidate plans and, overall, it is not reassuring.  Mostly gassy bromides.  First Mr. Cheshire who wants a new bond proposal that "would actually meet the needs of students."  OK, and how would the bond be designed to do that? Doesn't say.He wants to "figure out why OSD is losing so many students."  He then says he knows why: "We are losing the students because we are losing the teachers." And his bond proposal would address this how? Crickets.Ms. Wilkinson says she'll stress "equality and access."  "“I think all students in the district should have access to nice facilities, high quality teachers and technology, and small, manageable classes,” Wilkinson said."  OK.  But do you know many  who don't support that?  I don't.  Her statement amounts to a bold courageous defence of motherhood, apple pie and the flag (educationally speaking). How do we achieve all that from where we are?  If Ms. Wilkinson knows, she isn't telling yet.Mr. Hueton is also concerned about student loss, favors "protecting neighborhood based schools."  Me too. Boy howdy yes, me too.  But how do we do that in the face of deteriorating buildings, declining enrollment, and therefor declining  state education money which is based on enrollment?  Does Mr. Huelton have a roadmap to get from here to there? Doesn't say.He does offer one specific, and it's one I like: He thinks "there’s not enough autonomy for teachers to do what they do best: teach,” Hueton said.... “ I think there  [are] a lot of opportunities to improve how teachers are empowered.”  Since (long ago, another place) I served on a textbook selection committee and heard a major text publisher's rep proudly promise that his company's elementary school social studies books were "teacher proof," I've been watching growing standardization erode teachers' autonomy in the classroom.  Mr. Hueton seems worried about it too. That at least is a  good sign.I know, this is a reporter's summary and no candidate got much space.  But still, I'd hoped for more specifics, fewer bromides straight out of the gate. Windy generalizations aren't going to help much. Hope all school board candidates offer, and the SE reports on,  much more substantive proposals as the campaign procedes.We shall see.  

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.