President Barack Obama’s designation of Bears Ears National Monument in December drew praise from tribes and environmental advocates while earning consternation from Utah state officials and San Juan County residents. 

For new Utah residents or those who weren’t paying close attention to the debate, the Bears Ears controversy can be tough to navigate.

Here we offer some background on Bears Ears, what might change with the designation and whether those protections will be permanent.

1. Where is the Bears Ears National Monument?

The new monument includes 1.35 million acres.

It lies west of Highway 191, following Moab 100 miles south to Bluff. Canyonlands National Park and a stretch of the Colorado River to Glen Canyon border to the west. Within its boundaries lie Natural Bridges National Monument, the Abajo Mountains, Cedar Mesa, the popular Indian Creek climbing area, the monument’s namesake Bears Ears buttes and thousands of archeological artifacts, including cave dwellings, petroglyphs and ceremonial kivas.

The Bears Ears area is an important site for Native American tribes. They use the area for hunting, fishing, ceremonies and collecting traditional plants. Many tribes, but not all, support the national monument designation.

Story continues below image.

2. Why is the designation controversial?

The Bears Ears area is the latest battle in the 40-year Sage Brush Rebellion, where Western ranchers, residents and lawmakers have fought to exert more state control over federal lands. State leaders urged Obama not to declare the area a monument, worrying it would hinder development in San Juan County, an already economically depressed region.

Gov. Gary Herbert also warned it could “fan the flames” of Utah’s public lands conflict. Utah lawmakers have demanded the federal government turn over more than 30 million acres of federally managed public land to the state.

The 1906 Antiquities Act allows presidents to protect federal lands by declaring national monuments. Many such monuments were later declared national parks by Congress, including Arches National Park.

Utah Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican, has called the monument proposal an “overreach,” since it protects such a large swath of land. He argued the Antiquities Act was meant to be confined to small areas of archeological significance to prevent looting and vandalism.

Story continues below image.

3. Did Utah lawmakers present alternatives?

Utah’s lawmakers agree the Bears Ears region contains unique cultural and scenic values that deserve protection. But they say local officials better understand how to manage Utah’s lands. Reps. Rob Bishop and Jason Chaffetz sponsored a Public Lands Initiative bill earlier this year in an effort to halt the national monument designation.

The bill would have included wilderness areas protected from mining and fossil fuel exploration, expanded Arches National Park and protected 357 miles of waterways as wild and scenic rivers. 

It also granted states more control over federal oil and gas leases. Environmental advocates argued the bill offered weak protection for the vast majority of the region’s cultural landscape and gave little representation to the tribal and conservation communities.

Congress adjourned this month without taking action on the bill.

4. What does the national monument designation mean for Bears Ears?

The national monument is smaller than a 1.9 million-acre inter-tribal coalition proposal and slightly larger than the Utah Public Lands Initiative bill. The U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management will coordinate with a tribal commission in managing the lands. 

The monument designation allows current authorized uses of the land, including hunting, fishing and grazing permits. Existing permits for oil and gas exploration, mining and utility corridors also will not change. 

No new oil and gas exploration or mining will be allowed

The secretaries of Interior and Agriculture will work with representatives from tribes, state and local government, recreational communities, and the public as it develops a management plan. That plan will designate motorized and non-motorized trails.

5. What does the future hold?

The future of Bears Ears continues to look rocky. Utah Sens. Orrin Hatch and Mike Lee, along with Gov. Herbert, have vowed to work with the incoming Donald Trump administration to overturn the designation. Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes plans to file a lawsuit against the action.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order Wednesday, April 26, directing his interior secretary to review the designation of dozens of national monuments on federal lands.

No national monument designation has been revoked by a president in the past, a November report by the Congressional Research Service notes, so no such action has been tested in court. Congress has clear authority to overturn a national monument, however, and has done so in the past. Presidents have also successfully expanded and decreased the acreage of existing national monuments. 

Contact Reporter Leia Larsen at 801-625-4289 or Follow her on or on Twitter @LeiaLarsen.

(11) comments


Thanks Obama for trying to stop the development of gas and oil to this entire state. For our representative are greedy, Koch brother supporters and do not care about how unique and beautiful this state is.


Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !st286c:On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I've had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it !st286c:➽➽➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash576DigitalPost\GetPay$97\Hour... ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!st286c:....,..........



“Members of the Utah delegation have demonstrated their lack of respect for Tribal leaders and Tribal concerns. They have supported an investigation of the Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition by the state legislature, ignored the sovereign authority of Coalition member governments, made false claims about the lack of support for a national monument while exaggerating opposition and creating conflict within Native communities and excluded the Coalition from input on the PLI that is in markup today. The PLI process has done anything but unite locals and does not offer the ‘grand compromise’ promised” said Davis Filfred, Utah-based Navajo Nation Council Delegate (representing Mexican Water, Aneth, Teec Nos Pos, Tółikan, Red Mesa).


Led by the Hopi, Zuni, Ute Mountain Ute, Navajo and Ute Indian Tribes, and supported by more than 25 tribes across the Southwest as well as the National Congress of American Indians, the Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition has called on the Obama administration to designate 1.9 million acres of public lands in southeastern Utah as a collaboratively-managed Bears Ears National Monument.



That is not a tribe, that is dissent within a tribe. There are always apples, and your bias is there for all to see. Leia, this kind of distortion of facts really hurts your credibility. I will keep it firmly in mind and grant you all the credibility you deserve.

LeiaLarsen Staff

Some members of the Navajo National gathered with the governor earlier this year to speak against a national monument:


Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !sq163c:On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I've had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it !sq163c:➽➽➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash453TopWorldwide\GetPay$97\Hour... ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!sq163c:....,....


Thanks Amazon for agreeing to voluntarily collect use taxes on all Utah orders! This will give the state funds to sue the feds and try to get this National Monument designation reversed. Your Utah tax dollars at work!


Many tribes, but not all, support the National Monument designation, you say. Which tribes specifically don't support it? I would hate to imply that I don't believe you, but I don't believe you.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.