BZ 061014 Weber River 01.JPG

Th Weber River flows out of Weber Canyon on Tuesday, June, 10, 2014. The Davis and Weber Counties Canal Co. has received a grant from the Bureau of Land Management to replace over 1,600 feet of pipe and to begin construction on a new hydroelectric plant near the mouth of Weber Canyon. (BENJAMIN ZACK/Standard-Examiner)

Judge Keith Kelly made the right decision when he ruled in favor of granting public access to a popular fishing and canoeing section of the Weber River above Rockport Reservoir.

Kelly’s ruling came after a five-day trial in Utah’s 3rd District Court over a lawsuit filed by the Utah Stream Access Coalition after the Legislature passed a 2010 measure that allowed private land owners along “non-navigable” sections of rivers to block public land access.

The court decision recognized the Weber River was used for commerce at the time of statehood, with logs floated downstream for the construction of mines and railroads. This made the 2010 decision to limit access unlawful.

This was basically an historical loophole that predated the 2010 measure that allowed for the court’s ruling. Regardless, of the legal semantics we have always supported public access to public waterways.

The court ruling instructs landowner defendants “to remove any no trespassing signs that restrict use of the streambed, and prohibits them from continuing to interfere with the public’s rights to use the river and its beds for lawful recreational purposes.”

But with access comes responsibility.

Landowners say they were forced to seek a legislative remedy because recreational users were trashing their property. We understand their grievances. However, banning access was not the answer. Recreational users need to be more responsible in their conduct. And landowners should contact local law enforcement to enforce existing litter laws when things get out of hand.

We also hope that conservation organizations, and even the coalition that brought the suit, help organize cleanup efforts when needed. This is a common practice along public trails, and recreational locations all over the country.

The court decision will benefit birdwatchers, river runners and tubers, fisherman and hikers. We hope these users can come together and help police this beautiful stretch of the river, and nearby private property, they now are entitled to use.

(1) comment

anonymous

If landowners along a state highway were complaining of litter and vandalism, the solution would NEVER be to privatize the public highway. Instead the solution would be to do public education, volunteer cleanups, and improve enforcement in that area of existing laws that make littering and vandalism illegal. Use that example next time you hear crazy people saying the solution is take public land and make it private.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.