Layin’ It on the Line: Retirement and real estate — Should you downsize, rent or stay put?
Photo supplied
Lyle BossIf you’re a retiree sitting on a house you bought 30 years ago, congratulations — you might be living inside a gold mine. Thanks to decades of appreciation, many baby boomers are now “house rich” but facing the big question: What do I do with all this equity?
Do you stay put, downsize, rent or sell and take the cash? The right answer depends on your finances, lifestyle and — let’s be honest — your emotions. A house isn’t just an investment. It’s where you raised your kids, hosted Thanksgiving and probably accumulated more Tupperware lids than bowls.
Option 1: Stay put and age in place
Staying in your home means familiarity, comfort and stability. No packing, no moving, no emotional stress of leaving the place you know best. If you’ve already paid off your mortgage, your housing costs may be much lower than alternatives.
But there’s a catch. Property taxes, insurance and maintenance add up. Retirees often underestimate the costs of keeping an older home running. A new roof, HVAC system or plumbing issue can quickly eat into retirement savings.
If you plan to stay put, consider remodeling with aging in mind — grab bars, wider doorways and fewer stairs. Think of it as future-proofing your castle.
Option 2: Downsize and simplify
For many retirees, the idea of a smaller, easier-to-manage home is appealing. Downsizing can free up equity and reduce ongoing expenses like utilities, lawn care and upkeep.
Selling a large home at today’s higher prices could provide a financial cushion. Imagine turning a 3,000-square-foot house into a 1,500-square-foot bungalow and pocketing a few hundred thousand in the process. That money can be invested, used for travel or reserved for health care needs.
Of course, downsizing isn’t just about square footage — it’s about simplifying your life. Less space often means less clutter, fewer chores and more time for things you enjoy.
Option 3: Renting for flexibility
Renting may not sound attractive at first; after all, you’ve spent decades working to own your home. But for retirees, renting can be liberating. No maintenance, no surprise repair bills and the flexibility to move if your needs change.
Renting can also make sense if you want to live closer to family, or if you’re not sure where you want to settle in retirement. Maybe winters in Arizona and summers near the grandkids? Renting makes those moves much easier.
The downside: rents can rise, and you won’t build equity. But if you’ve already cashed out of a larger home, renting can allow you to preserve your savings while enjoying a maintenance-free lifestyle.
Option 4: Sell and relocate
Some retirees sell their homes entirely and use the proceeds to relocate — whether to a retirement community, a warmer climate or closer to family. This can reduce living expenses and align your environment with your lifestyle goals.
The challenge is making sure the move doesn’t isolate you. Retirement happiness is strongly tied to social connections, so think about community, not just climate or cost of living.
The emotional side
Deciding what to do with your home isn’t purely financial. It’s emotional. Many retirees feel attached to the memories held within their walls. But remember — your memories move with you. The house is bricks and wood. The love is what stays.
The bottom line
There’s no one-size-fits-all solution. Staying may provide stability. Downsizing can add financial flexibility. Renting offers freedom. Relocating can deliver a fresh start.
The key is to weigh your finances against your lifestyle goals and be honest about what will bring you the most peace of mind.
Because in retirement, your home should work for you — not the other way around.
Lyle Boss, The REAL BOSS Financial, endorsed by Glenn Beck as the premier retirement advisor for Utah and the Mountain West States. Boss Financial, 955 Chambers St. Suite 250, Ogden, UT 84403. Telephone: 801-475-9400.

