Great Salt Lake dust could cost $1.5B to fix with costs ‘skyrocketing’ as more lakebed is exposed
-
- A dust storm blows off the exposed lake bed of the Great Salt Lake at Farmington Bay and into Salt Lake City on Aug. 19, 2022.
-
- Great Salt Lake Collaborative
Editor’s note: This article is published through the Great Salt Lake Collaborative, a solutions journalism initiative that partners news, education and media organizations to help inform people about the plight of the Great Salt Lake — and what can be done to make a difference before it is too late. Read all of our stories at greatsaltlakenews.org.
ST. GEORGE, Utah — Mitigating dust from a shrinking Great Salt Lake could cost more than a billion dollars to fix, a new report from the Utah State Legislature’s Auditor General found.
Tucked in an audit on critical state needs, FOX 13 News found a footnote in a section on Utah’s water demands referencing the exposed lake bed. It said that “dust mitigation” from an exposed lake bed could cost taxpayers at least $1.5 billion to fix with ongoing annual maintenance of $15 million.
“Those estimates skyrocket if costs and affected surface area increase,” the audit said.
The audit’s finding concerned newly-appointed Great Salt Lake Commissioner Brian Steed.
“I think all Utahns have to be concerned that if we don’t do the right things now, we’re paying much higher costs later,” he told FOX 13 News. “That’s why we need to get ahead of it and make sure the Great Salt Lake is healthy today.”
Scientists have warned with an exposed lake bed, Utahns in populated areas around the lake would be at risk of exposures to toxic minerals — including arsenic — that are naturally occurring in the Great Salt Lake. The solution, they have argued, is getting more water into the lake to cover it to avoid it from blowing into communities.
A lawsuit was recently filed against the state, accusing political leaders of not doing enough to save the Great Salt Lake. Environmental groups, who are plaintiffs in the litigation, have expressed frustration at what they view is not concrete enough action to help the Great Salt Lake.
Asked about the litigation at the Utah State Legislature’s interim session in St. George, House Speaker Brad Wilson, R-Kaysville, defended lawmakers’ actions.
“Anyone can file a lawsuit for any purpose, and I think it would be disingenuous to say the legislature has not done a tremendous amount over the last few years around water. Well over $1 billion in the last three years around water and the Great Salt Lake is a major beneficiary of that. Washington County is a big beneficiary of that, too,” he said.
The Speaker said the Great Salt Lake will be a major beneficiary of agriculture optimization, which received a $276 million investment from lawmakers this year. That’s new technology to get farmers to switch to newer, water-saving technologies.
Grants for agriculture optimization are starting to be rolled out.
Senate President J. Stuart Adams, R-Layton, said he appreciated the concerns of environmental groups about the Great Salt Lake, but “in my opinion, rather than file a lawsuit let’s roll up our sleeves and help fix it.”