I am writing to address some inaccuracies in Senator Mitt Romney’s recent remarks concerning cannabis legalization, as reported in your publication. Senator Romney suggested that cannabis legalization could jeopardize our international trade deals and alliances, citing international treaties as a primary obstacle. However, this perspective is not supported by the facts and warrants clarification.

Firstly, numerous cannabis companies and advocacy organizations have pointed out that the international treaties in question–principally the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961–provide ample flexibility for nations to reform their domestic drug policies. Indeed, several countries that are signatories to these treaties, including Canada and Uruguay, have already legalized cannabis without facing significant international repercussions or breaches of treaty obligations.

It is crucial to understand that the treaty allows for considerable discretion in how countries control substances on their territory, provided that the overarching goals of public health and welfare are upheld. This flexibility has been affirmed by legal scholars and international bodies who have studied the treaty’s provisions in detail.

Moreover, Senator Romney’s concerns about negative impacts on trade deals and alliances seem to overlook the evolving global stance on cannabis. Many of our allies are moving toward a more progressive approach to cannabis, recognizing its medical benefits and the failures of prohibition. Aligning our laws with this global shift could, in fact, strengthen our international relationships by demonstrating adaptability and respect for scientific consensus on cannabis.

It is vital for public discourse on this issue to be informed by accurate information and grounded in a realistic understanding of international law and relations. Misrepresentations serve only to hinder progress and stifle informed debate.

Michael Harris

Layton

Newsletter