×
×
homepage logo

Layin’ It on the Line: Downsizing, reverse mortgages or staying put? Smart real estate moves for Utah retirees in a high-cost housing market

By Lyle Boss - Special to the Standard-Examiner | May 12, 2026

Photo supplied

Lyle Boss

For most Utah retirees, the home is the largest asset on the balance sheet. Bigger than the IRA. Bigger than the pension. Bigger than the brokerage account.

And yet, when retirement income gets tight, the home is often the last asset people think about strategically. They worry about it, live in it and hold tight — without ever asking whether the way they own it still fits the life they’re living.

Let me lay it on the line.

The Utah housing puzzle

Utah’s median home value sits around $500,000, and many retirees in Davis, Salt Lake, Summit, and Washington counties are sitting on far more. The good news: Utah’s effective property tax rate is one of the lowest in the country at roughly 0.55%, thanks to the constitutional 45% primary-residence exemption. The median Utah homeowner pays about $2,500 a year in property tax — well under half what folks pay in Texas or New Jersey on a comparable home.

The bad news: home insurance is climbing. Utility bills are climbing. Roofs, HVAC, water heaters and yard care don’t pause for retirement. And property taxes, while modest in rate, still rise as values rise. The all-in cost of keeping a paid-off home can quietly run $700 to $1,200 a month.

That’s the puzzle. Most of the wealth is in the house. Most of the cost is, too. So what’s the smart move?

There are really only three paths.

Path one: Downsize

Downsizing is the cleanest answer when it works. Sell, capture the equity, buy something smaller, live on the difference.

Under IRS Section 121, a married couple can exclude up to $500,000 of gain on the sale of a primary residence ($250,000 for singles), provided they’ve lived there two of the last five years. For longtime Utah owners, that exclusion is often the difference between keeping their gain and writing a six-figure check to the IRS.

The catch is that “smaller” doesn’t always mean “cheaper” in today’s Utah market. A right-sized condo in Ogden, St. George or Lehi can cost more than the four-bedroom home you raised the kids in. A useful rule of thumb: Downsizing should free at least $150,000 to $200,000 of net equity to be worth the disruption.

Path two: A reverse mortgage

This is the path most folks misunderstand. A modern Home Equity Conversion Mortgage, or HECM, is FHA-insured and built around protections that didn’t exist 20 years ago.

You must be 62 or older. You retain title. There are no required monthly principal-and-interest payments. The 2026 maximum claim amount is $1,249,125, so most Utah homes qualify. Proceeds can come as a lump sum, monthly payments or — the version most planners prefer — a line of credit that grows over time, regardless of what the home is worth.

The proceeds are not taxable income. They do not count toward Modified Adjusted Gross Income, so they do not push you into a higher IRMAA bracket or affect Social Security taxation.

You still have to pay property taxes, homeowners insurance and maintain the home. Skip those and you can default. Used right, a HECM can replace the need to draw down a portfolio in a down market, fund long-term care premiums or bridge the years before full Social Security. Used wrong, it eats equity heirs were counting on.

It’s a tool. Like every tool, it works for some jobs and not others.

Path three: Stay put

Aging in place has real value Wall Street doesn’t measure. A neighborhood you know. A church where you have callings and friends. Grandkids 10 minutes away. For many Utah retirees, no spreadsheet beats that.

The honest version of staying put builds in three things. First, a maintenance reserve — figure 1% of home value per year, set aside in a dedicated account. Second, a plan for accessibility before you need it. Wider doorways, a main-floor bedroom, grab bars and good lighting cost far less in advance than after a fall. Third, an honest look at long-term care exposure. The asset-protection angle

Here’s the part most real estate articles skip. Your primary residence is generally a protected asset if a spouse needs Medicaid for long-term care, up to a federal home equity cap of about $730,000. Pull a large reverse mortgage and convert that equity to cash, and the protection changes — cash is a countable asset.

The right sequence usually looks like this. Address long-term care risk first, with insurance or an annuity-based strategy. Then look at the home as a planning tool, not the planning tool. Done in that order, you can use home equity as supplemental income without giving up the protection the home naturally provides.

How to decide

Three questions clarify almost every case. Does this home still fit how I live, or how I lived 20 years ago? Is the cost of staying eroding the rest of my plan? If I needed long-term care for two years starting tomorrow, what would happen?

Answer those honestly, and the right path usually picks itself.

Lyle Boss, The REAL BOSS Financial, a native Utahn and retirement specialist who has spent decades helping families across Utah and the Mountain West build secure, income-focused retirement plans. Boss Financial, 955 Chambers St. Suite 250, Ogden, UT 84403. Telephone: 801-475-9400. https://www.safemoneylyleboss.com/

Starting at $4.32/week.

Subscribe Today