Home
ePaper
Clear sky
Sunrise and Sunset Times
7:32 am
7:40 pm
46.4 °F
Humidity: 23 %

Weather | Traffic
Photos of the Week
RSSMobileFacebookTwitterMoviesSpottedBlogs




Tags:





'I Pledge!' video causes controversy at school

By Chris O'Nan (Standard-Examiner Davis Bureau)

Last Edit: Sep 2 2009 - 11:14pm

FARMINGTON -- Eagle Bay Elementary officials came under fire this week after showing students a "pledge to service" video that a conservative lobbying group complained aligned too closely with President Obama.
In the end, Principal Ofelia Wade responded to complaints about the video by sending parents a letter of "heartfelt apology."
"I am sincerely sorry that in our zeal to find an engaging and motivating means of introducing the theme to the students, I neglected to anticipate the potential that aspects of the video clip, which was solely intended to promote the value of service, might be inappropriate for your children," Wade wrote to parents.
Gayle Ruzicka, president of the Utah Eagle Forum, denounced the showing of the video without parental permission.
She said in a news release that the video has a political message that supports a liberal agenda.
"This displays a total disregard for parental rights and authority and seems to be a thinly veiled attempt to indoctrinate our children with leftist propaganda," Ruzicka wrote.
The "I Pledge!" video can be seen on YouTube.
In the video, many high-profile celebrities pledged to help a neighbor, smile more, turn out lights and volunteer, along with pledges to support stem cell research and a clean environment. Anthony Kiedis, lead singer for the Red Hot Chili Peppers, pledged to serve Barack Obama. He also kissed his arm and pledged "allegiance to the funk, to the united funk of funkadelica."
Ruzicka said Kiedis' statement was "making a mockery of the Pledge of Allegiance." She also said it is dangerous to teach people to pledge service to the president. She said that pledge is for kings, while presidents serve the people.
In the last frame, the celebrities pledge "to be the change that we seek" -- a direct theme of the Obama presidential campaign.
The school's letter states that showing the video to the children was an attempt to inspire them to take part in yearlong service-themed activities. Wade acknowledged in the letter that she had not viewed the video before it was shown to students.
Chris Williams, spokesman for the Davis School District, said the district's concern was that the principal "should have viewed the video prior to showing it to the children."
Wade referred all questions about the incident to Williams, declining any comment to reporters.
Williams said Wade acknowledged that while the video was being shown to the children, she became uncomfortable with some messages in the clip.
"There are some areas in it that have what some people think is a political agenda," Williams said. "Ofelia hopes her mistake doesn't overshadow the effort to teach children at the school to serve other people and to reach out to others when they see a need."
Williams said Wade met with members of the Parent-Teacher Association over the summer to brainstorm about kicking off the new school year's theme of service. Wade asked PTA members to find a motivational video that would best represent that theme, and the "I Pledge!" video was chosen, Williams said.
Wade was not directed by the district to send letters of apology, he said.
"The overall thought has been that the theme of the video is serving -- that one person can make a difference," Williams said.
Utah Eagle Forum also took exception to the parts of the video where environmental issues were raised, especially those pledging to stop using plastic bags and bottles and limit toilet flushing.
Ruzicka said a lot of families may not view those issues as important. She said children seeing the video may see their mother use plastic bags from the store and "begin questioning her actions."
Ruzicka said she was glad to hear the school was apologizing to parents.
"I think that is great," she said. "I certainly would hope that this won't happen in the future and the schools will make sure the parents are notified. Hopefully, this will be stopped."



Tags:


2 comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
 
rzk5f5 wrote 27 weeks 2 days ago

There is actually a big

There is actually a big difference between ending the Pledge of Allegiance in schools and not allowing this video to be seen by students.  Pledging allegiance to the flag or to our country is VERY different from pledging allegiance to a person.  I don't care if the president is a Democrat, Republican, or whether or not I agree with his policies.  We do not serve our president, he is a public servant.  It is a dangerous arena to allow this sort of mentality in America even on a small scale.   Look to the history of Stalin and Hitler prewar and notice similarities with a country in distress where citizens are looking for a Savior they can pledge allengiance to who will save them and the country.  Our country is vulneralbe right now,  but we need to keep our heads on and remember what we are about.  The PEOPLE are the guides, thinkers, and decision makers which is why we do NOT pledge allegiance to the president.


Rush wrote 28 weeks 20 hours ago

Wheres the controversy?

 I've watched the video and I just don't see the controversy in it. So where is the problem? This is not brainwashing or telling anyone what to do or how to act. The viewer is given the option to “Pledge” to help out on numerous social problems in American and around the word. This short video is not mandating any view other than just being a good person and doing the right thing for people in need and the environment, those are not evil things in any respected rather they are moral and proper things to be done by the individual in helping out the whole of national concerns. Brainwashing is more in line with the dogma heard each day on talk radio and conservative shows that do not allow for individual options.
 
There is noting wrong in teaching children to be optimistic in the future where they will have a part in making a difference in the world. That is one of the goals of America to allow the individual the chance to make something out of their lives that helps others and in the end we all prosper from the assistance or in this case the “Pledge.” If you watch the video and disagree with it in whole or in part that is your choice, not everything in the video will appeal to all that view it. But if it makes things better for the American citizen where is the controversy in that?
 
If you are apposed to the video you may as well end the Pledge of Allegiance in schools and school events because there is no difference in what it is asking. The only controversy I can see is those that blindly fight anything new from the Obama President's Office just because it is from Obama. Let it go, this battle is just not worth it - it is a good idea, and nothing and no one is hurt in anyway. If you don't like this video or don't wanting to watch it - Sponge Bob is can still be found on cartoon network for you kids viewing enjoyment. And if you really dislike the video then: - don't help people, don't help the environment, do save fuel and energy and go out and buy lots of bottled water and bring home in plastic bags – the only ones you are going to hurt is your children, and all their children.


Please register or login to post a comment.
EasyAds






 





RSSMobileFacebookTwitterMoviesSpottedBlogs